中文
EN

ILCOR:心肺复苏和心血管急救治疗推荐国际共识(2024概要)

制定者:
国际复苏联络委员会(ILCOR,International Liaision Committee on Resuscitation)

2024年11月13日

686人浏览

2收藏

5次下载

摘要:

中英对照

This is the eighth annual summary of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations; a more comprehensive review was done in 2020. This latest summary addresses the most recent published resuscitation evidence reviewed by the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation task force science experts. Members from 6 International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation task forces have assessed, discussed, and debated the quality of the evidence, using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation criteria, and their statements include consensus treatment recommendations. Insights into the deliberations of the task forces are provided in the Justification and Evidence-to-Decision Framework Highlights sections. In addition, the task forces list priority knowledge gaps for further research.

这是国际复苏联络委员会关于心肺复苏和紧急心血管护理科学与治疗建议的国际共识的第八届年度总结;2020年进行了更全面的审查。这篇最新的摘要论述了由国际复苏联络委员会工作组科学专家审查的最新发表的复苏证据。来自6个国际复苏联络委员会工作组的成员使用建议分级评估、发展和评估标准对证据的质量进行了评估、讨论和辩论,他们的声明包括共识治疗建议。关于工作组审议情况的见解见“论证”和“循证决策框架要点”部分。此外,工作组还列出了有待进一步研究的优先知识差距。

下载医学界医生站


关注医生站公众号
临床指南
ILCOR:心肺复苏和心血管急救治疗推荐国际共识(2024概要)
发布时间:  2024年11月13日
制定者:  
国际复苏联络委员会(ILCOR,International Liaision Committee on Resuscitation)

686人浏览

2收藏

5次下载

摘要

This is the eighth annual summary of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations; a more comprehensive review was done in 2020. This latest summary addresses the most recent published resuscitation evidence reviewed by the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation task force science experts. Members from 6 International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation task forces have assessed, discussed, and debated the quality of the evidence, using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation criteria, and their statements include consensus treatment recommendations. Insights into the deliberations of the task forces are provided in the Justification and Evidence-to-Decision Framework Highlights sections. In addition, the task forces list priority knowledge gaps for further research.

收藏
切换中文
阅读全文