The American College of Cardiology (ACC) has a long history of developing documents (eg, decision path ways, appropriate use criteria) to provide clinicians with guidance on both clinical and nonclinical topics relevant to cardiovascular care. In most circumstances, these documents have been created to complement clinical practice guidelines and to inform clinicians about areas where evidence is new and evolving or where sufficient data is more limited. Despite this, numerous gaps persist, highlighting the need for more streamlined and efficient processes to implement best practices in pa tient care. 

Central to the ACC’s strategic plan is the generation of actionable knowledge—a concept that places emphasis on making clinical information easier to consume, share, integrate, and update. To this end, the ACC has shifted from developing isolated documents to creating inte grated “solution sets.” These are groups of closely related activities, policy, mobile applications, decision-support tools, and other resources necessary to transform care and/or improve heart health. Solution sets address key questions facing care teams and offer practical guidance to be applied at the point of care. They use both estab lished and emerging methods to disseminate information for cardiovascular conditionsandtheir relatedmanage ment. The success of solution sets rests firmly on their ability to have a measurable impact on the delivery of care. Because solution sets reflect current evidence and ongoing gaps in care, the associated tools will be refined over time to match changing evidence and member needs.

美国心脏病学会（ACC）长期以来一直致力于制定各类文件（如决策路径、适宜性使用标准等），为临床医生提供与心血管护理相关的临床及非临床主题的指导。在大多数情况下，这些文件的制定旨在补充临床实践指南，帮助临床医生了解那些证据新兴且不断发展的领域，或是数据较为有限的领域。尽管如此，仍存在诸多差距，这凸显了需要更精简高效的流程来落实患者护理中的最佳实践。

 ACC战略计划的核心是“可操作知识”——这一理念强调让临床信息更易于理解、分享、整合和更新。为此，ACC已从制定孤立文件转向创建整合的“解决方案集”。这些解决方案集包含一系列密切相关的活动、政策、移动应用程序、决策支持工具及其他必要资源，旨在转变护理模式和/或改善心脏健康。解决方案集聚焦护理团队面临的关键问题，提供可在临床一线应用的实用指导。它们通过现有及新兴方法，传播有关心血管疾病及其相关管理的信息。解决方案集的成功，关键在于其能否对护理服务的提供产生可衡量的影响。由于解决方案集反映了当前的证据水平及护理中存在的持续差距，相关工具将随证据的变化和成员需求的更新而不断完善。